First and foremost, my heart goes out to the victims and
their families. This horrible event has
changed more lives than anyone will ever know. It is yet another situation when
questions should be asked to help prevent this happening again in the future.
This post, and posts like these will not be habit. I do not believe in shoving my political views in people's faces, but this has weighed on my heart for awhile, and then listening to the news at 3:30 am broke my heart.
There is a good question that needs to be asked today. Is a
handgun or vehicle more dangerous? If I do not have my pistol on me and really
have the urge to kill someone, I would just run them over. If in doubt, backup
and run them over again. The people killed yearly by vehicular man slaughter
far outnumber the people killed by handguns.
Be prepared. Today we will be pelted with more politicians
and such with more gun restriction purposals. They will spew at how the guns are at fault, but keep this straight, a psycho
man killed those poor people, not a gun. Gun laws are at their strictest, but
yet crime is at its highest. It looks
like this would make people open their eyes and realize we are going about this
all wrong. Instead of a state deciding
who can and cannot own a gun, why not let EVERY citizen own a gun? We let EVERY
citizen get a license to drive a vehicle.
I think there needs to be a serious reevaluation of the laws. Why not
require anyone of a certain age who wants to carry a weapon to take a class?
There should be a training course, written test, and actual skills test. Then
be issued a gun license exactly like their driver’s license. Then if there are offenses their license
would be revoked, again, like a driver’s license. The class should be as
extensive as driving tests are meant to be.
Classes on general care, cleaning, handling, gun ethics, caliber, quick
response, and accuracy should be taught, and then required to pass. There are a
hundred different things that I have not mentioned, but I think you get the gist
of what I am trying to put across. Not to mention, the economical boost. It would be an industry that would expand tremendously and create jobs. That is something this economy needs more than anything right now.
If there had been one, just one, responsible armed person in
that theatre, there would only be two people in the hospital right now, the
victim of the first shot fired, and the gunman. He would have fired that first
shot and then the situation would have been handled. Gun laws do not stop
criminals from carrying. They only make it harder for upstanding citizens to be
armed. It took over two years for me to legally own a handgun in New York. Then,
I was still not allowed to carry it. I am not trying to say this would be the
perfect fix, but it would definitely be a better option that what is being
placed right now. I hate to sound like a
close-minded old man, but carrying a gun is our Constitutional Right, but in
law making, that really does not seem to have any bearing anymore.